6 Comments

Planned Parenthood to spread its poisoned roots into shopping malls

From Albert Mohler’s blog comes this frightening article about how the wormwood tree known as Planned Parenthood (motto: “We’ve never met a baby we didn’t want to kill, or a profit we didn’t want to make!“) is spreading out its roots into shopping malls:

“It is indeed a new look…a new branding, if you will.” That’s the explanation offered by Leslie Durgin, a senior vice president at Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains. She was speaking of Planned Parenthood’s new “upscale” approach to marketing abortions and other “services” to wealthier suburban women.

This new strategy and marketing plan was described in chilling detail by reporter Stephanie Simon of The Wall Street Journal [article available by subscription only]. “Flush with cash, Planned Parenthood affiliates nationwide are aggressively expanding their reach,” she explains, “seeking to woo more affluent patients with a network of suburban clinics and huge new health centers that project a decidedly upscale image.”

Not content to lead poor women astray with the notion that their best option is to kill their child, they are now targeting the wombs of wealthy, upscale women with their product–death.

Make no mistake about it, Planned Parenthood has an agenda, even as it did when founded by Margaret Sanger and other radicals in the early 20th century. The organization receives hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue from killing unborn babies. It wants to extend its reach into the population.
As Simon reports:

[Wall Street Journal artcle begins]: Last spring, the nonprofit — which has 882 clinics nationwide — dropped its crusading mission statement setting out the rights of all individuals, no matter their income, to “reproductive self-determination.” In its place, Planned Parenthood adopted a crisp pledge to “leverage strength through our affiliated structure to be the nation’s most trusted provider of sexual and reproductive health care.” Ms. Richards says the new statement implies expanded services for all — she’s especially eager to draw more male patients — but some outsiders wonder why it no longer mentions affordability or access.

This is not the Planned Parenthood we all grew up with… they now have more of a business approach, much more aggressive,” said Amy Hagstrom Miller, who runs abortion clinics in Texas and Maryland.[End of WSJ article]

The article does mention, however, that PP will

offer services just short of abortions

at these storefronts. They may not perform abortions there, but you know they will be talking them up. Kinda like how drug dealers get people hooked by giving them some junk for free, just to get them hooked, so when they’re ready they’ll know where to get their fix.

Now, PP may be claiming that they are moving into malls to attract adult women. But who do they really think they are trying to fool? Who is it that makes up a large percentage of mall population? That’s right! teenagers! Just like beer and cigarette companies market to younger and younger demographics to get kids buying their products early, this is exactly what Planned Parenthood is doing.

[WSJ article begins]: The group has always operated some suburban clinics, but some of its local affiliates, which have a great deal of autonomy, have made a determined effort in the past few years to “be the provider of first choice…for people who do have other options,” said David Greenberg, Oregon’s top Planned Parenthood executive. Officials note that health insurance doesn’t always cover contraception and even women with access to private doctors may prefer the confidentiality of buying birth control or getting a herpes test at a Planned Parenthood clinic.

It is high time we follow the population,” said Sarah Stoesz, who heads Planned Parenthood operations in three Midwest states. She recently opened three express centers in wealthy Minnesota suburbs, “in shopping centers and malls, places where women are already doing their grocery shopping, picking up their Starbucks, living their daily lives,” Ms. Stoesz said. [WSJ article ends]

One Planned Parenthood executive went so far as to say, “I like to think of it as the LensCrafters of family planning.”

That’s right! Pick up some jeans at the Gap, grab a half-caff latte at Starbucks, and learn how to kill your child, all under one roof! How sick can a person possibly be? To equate the murder of a child to getting contact lenses? Thank you, Warren Court! Oh, and for all of those who think this is all about “women’s health,” and that Planned Parenthood is just in it to help women, and they have no ulterior motives, look at that line in the above blockquote: some of its local affiliates, which have a great deal of autonomy, have made a determined effort in the past few years to “be the provider of first choice…for people who do have other options,”

It’s a business, folks! To lift the name of an old Megadeth album (yeah, I used to listen to them. Don’t remind me!), “Killing is our business, and business is good!”

Planned Parenthood may try to brush up the organization’s image, but the business remains abortion. In a chilling reminder of the grotesque intersection of baby killing and business, local independent abortion centers are complaining that Planned Parenthood threatens their own volume in abortions. Amy Hagstrom Miller runs abortion clinics in two states, and she is not pleased:

[WSJ article begins]: “Ms. Hagstrom Miller competes with Planned Parenthood for abortion patients — and finds it deeply frustrating. She does not receive the government grants or tax-deductible donations that bolster Planned Parenthood, and says she can’t match the nonprofit’s budget for advertising or clinic upgrades. She has carved her own niche by touting her care as more holistic — and by charging $425 for a first-trimester surgery at her Austin clinic, compared with $475 at the local Planned Parenthood. (Both Ms. Hagstrom Miller and Planned Parenthood say they work out discounts and payment plans for the needy.) [WSJ article ends]

This is about revenue and profit, market growth and competition. It is a horrifying glimpse into the cold hard reality of what stands behind the abortion movement in general and Planned Parenthood in particular — the ideology of death and the love of money. Can we imagine a more lethal combination?

Planned Parenthood may soon be coming to a mall near you, but no matter how much they want to burnish their image and go “upscale,” their business remains death on demand. The Culture of Death creeps on — mile by mile, mall by mall.

King Ahaz burned his children in the fires of Molech. Today we suck them out of the womb.

6 comments on “Planned Parenthood to spread its poisoned roots into shopping malls

  1. And this is a surprise why? More than half of “professing American Christendom” thinks this is ok, why should non-believers be any different.

    The gOD of America has spoken and his name be the “almighty dollar and the American dream”.

    America is already under wrath, and it started with non-belief and not giving glory and honor to God. Baby killing and sodomy is a result of the turned over, useless, reprobate mind. Only the Gospel can change hearts and minds.

  2. Well, in all honestly, if these women weren’t having abortions, they would be giving birth to innocent children that they neglected (or worse).

    Or we will go back to the days when women were getting butchered in the streets having underground abortions.

    Doesn’t the bible also say NOT TO JUDGE others?

    All you bible bangers and politicians should butt out.

    And no, I’ve never had an abortion myself, but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know this is no one’s business but the womans.

    Liz

  3. Liz,

    You want to know what’s so ironic about your arguments? I used to make those very same arguments back when I was in favor of abortion. And you want to know what else? They were just as wrong back then as they are now.

    See, there’s these things in life called “consequences.” People these days don’t want to have to deal with them. So we have a society (and a certain Democratic presidential nominee) that says, “Well, she shouldn’t be punished with a baby. we should help her avoid the consequences of her actions which she entered into fully aware of the risks involved.” Just like the whole ACT-UP crowd that ran around for so long blaming Ronald Reagan for spreading AIDS. As if it was Reagan who was out there having unprotected sex with people he didn’t know–then blaming someone else.

    The whole back-alley abortion thing is also an emotional scare tactic. If she doesn’t want the baby, then offer it for adoption. And BTW, there have been just as many women who have died from “safe and legal” abortions as from your infamous “back-alley butcher.”

    “Judging others.” If there is one verse of Scripture a person knows, it’s that one. We are to judge others’ actions as to whether they are sinful. But we do not judge the people themselves.

    And no, I’ve never had an abortion myself, but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know this is no one’s business but the womans.

    Although it is a decision that should be made between a woman and her unborn child.

    Sorry Liz, abortion is murder. It is the murder of a human being in the fetal stage of development. Period, paragraph.

  4. Fourpointer,

    Have you managed to figure out how a certain Democratic contender for the Presidency believes that fatherhood begins at conception, but life does not?? All these people holding out for women’s rights and forgetting about the future women of the world who are being sliced apart at the hands of murderers with a still beating heart nestled (safely??!!) under the heart of the mother.

    The Desert Pastor

  5. DP,

    I haven’t figured out how that certain Democratic contender believes ANYTHING he says. What he says is like the weather: If you don’t like it, wait 5 minutes, it’ll change. My goodness, he makes Her Hillaryness look like the Rock of Gibraltar™.

    Basically, for the average liberal, all men are slime, and should not have any rights to begin with. So if a man impregnates a girl, and forces her to keep it (as they like to call all unborn children “it”), then it’s his responsibility to pay for everything, no mater what.t

    It all comes down to votes, my friend. A child that survives pregnancy may vote Republican when they get older, but the girl who needs an abortion will probably vote Democrat right now. For the Dems, that’s all that matters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: